Home / Services / Audit and Assurance
Service area 05 · Audit and Assurance
We review your program and system with independent eyes
We assess program decisions, go-live readiness and the processes and design of your live SAP system based on evidence. We present critical findings, priorities and the issues that need a decision in a clear report.
Three sources of evidenceSAP Audit
Source 1
The process the business expects
Source 2
Design and configuration in SAP
Source 3
Sampled transactions and practice
Assessment
Comparison and evidenced gaps
Finding, business impact and recommended action→
01 / Decision points
Which decisions do we support?
Before you start
Are scope, governance, readiness and expected benefits clear enough?
While the program runs
Which gaps must close before moving to the next phase?
At go-live
What evidence supports business, data, testing, user and operational readiness?
In the live system
Are the expected process, the SAP design and actual practice aligned, and can expected benefits be tracked?
02 / Services in this area
Three assessment formats, as needed
Subscription, reporting frequency and measurement period are set according to your scope.
Comparison
Service 01 · suggested first step
Program Check-up
One-time overview
Service 02
Program Assurance
Regular, at decision points
Service 03
SAP Audit
Design, process and technical
When?
When you need a one-time overview of the program's plan, governance and risk status.
When you need regular assessment at critical decision points throughout the program and after go-live.
When the SAP design, processes and selected technical and control areas, current or in transformation scope, are being questioned.
Deliverable
Finding and risk list, assessment report, prioritized recommendations.
Phase-gate assessments, readiness view, benefit indicators and action tracking.
Design, process and technical findings within the reviewed scope, with evidence and remediation recommendations.
Stage
Before · during the program
During the program · after go-live
During the program · after go-live
03 / Method
How do we move from claims to findings?
1
We define the review question
We agree on the decision, scope, stakeholders and assessment criteria.
2
We gather evidence
We review documents and interviews and, where the scope allows, system and transaction samples.
3
We assess consistency
We identify the gaps between the expected state, the design and actual practice.
4
We tie findings to decisions
We clearly report business impact, priority, recommended action and the issue that needs a decision.
04 / SAP Audit
We compare three sources of evidence
The process the business expects
↓ Expected flow and control
Design and configuration in SAP
↓ System design
Sampled transactions and practice
↓ Actual practice
Comparison and assessment
↓ Evidenced gaps
Finding, business impact and recommended action
We assess actual practice through selected transactions, samples and review scope; this does not mean every transaction is scanned automatically.
05 / Deliverables
What do you get?
✓A clear summary of the assessed scope and the evidence used.
✓Findings with their priority and business impact explained.
✓Critical gaps, issues that need a decision and recommended actions.
✓Depending on scope, phase-gate and go-live readiness assessment.
✓If benefits assurance is in scope, business indicators with defined data sources and owners.
Structure of a findingExample
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Review question | Have critical user acceptance tests been completed? |
| Evidence | Scenario list, results log and acceptance sign-off |
| Finding | No evidence of completion for some critical scenarios |
| Business impact | Uncertainty whether the related transaction will work in live use |
| Recommendation and decision | Complete the missing tests; assess the phase-gate decision against current evidence |
06 / Boundaries
How this differs from other areas
The assessing role, delivery responsibility and any potential conflicts of interest are disclosed at the start. We do not treat work we manage as an independent audit by default.
Other service areas
Let's talk
Let's talk about the decision you need to make.
Share where your program stands or the issue you are questioning in your current SAP system, and let's agree on the right assessment scope together.
or send an email: info@akademidx.com.tr
Home / Services / Audit and Assurance
Service area 05 · Audit and Assurance
We review your program and system with independent eyes
We assess program decisions, go-live readiness and the processes and design of your live SAP system based on evidence. We present critical findings, priorities and the issues that need a decision in a clear report.
Three sources of evidenceSAP Audit
Source 1
The process the business expects
Source 2
Design and configuration in SAP
Source 3
Sampled transactions and practice
Assessment
Comparison and evidenced gaps
Finding, business impact and recommended action→
01 / Decision points
Which decisions do we support?
Before you start
Are scope, governance, readiness and expected benefits clear enough?
While the program runs
Which gaps must close before moving to the next phase?
At go-live
What evidence supports business, data, testing, user and operational readiness?
In the live system
Are the expected process, the SAP design and actual practice aligned, and can expected benefits be tracked?
02 / Services in this area
Three assessment formats, as needed
Subscription, reporting frequency and measurement period are set according to your scope.
Comparison
Service 01 · suggested first step
Program Check-up
One-time overview
Service 02
Program Assurance
Regular, at decision points
Service 03
SAP Audit
Design, process and technical
When?
When you need a one-time overview of the program's plan, governance and risk status.
When you need regular assessment at critical decision points throughout the program and after go-live.
When the SAP design, processes and selected technical and control areas, current or in transformation scope, are being questioned.
Deliverable
Finding and risk list, assessment report, prioritized recommendations.
Phase-gate assessments, readiness view, benefit indicators and action tracking.
Design, process and technical findings within the reviewed scope, with evidence and remediation recommendations.
Stage
Before · during the program
During the program · after go-live
During the program · after go-live
03 / Method
How do we move from claims to findings?
1
We define the review question
We agree on the decision, scope, stakeholders and assessment criteria.
2
We gather evidence
We review documents and interviews and, where the scope allows, system and transaction samples.
3
We assess consistency
We identify the gaps between the expected state, the design and actual practice.
4
We tie findings to decisions
We clearly report business impact, priority, recommended action and the issue that needs a decision.
04 / SAP Audit
We compare three sources of evidence
The process the business expects
↓ Expected flow and control
Design and configuration in SAP
↓ System design
Sampled transactions and practice
↓ Actual practice
Comparison and assessment
↓ Evidenced gaps
Finding, business impact and recommended action
We assess actual practice through selected transactions, samples and review scope; this does not mean every transaction is scanned automatically.
05 / Deliverables
What do you get?
✓A clear summary of the assessed scope and the evidence used.
✓Findings with their priority and business impact explained.
✓Critical gaps, issues that need a decision and recommended actions.
✓Depending on scope, phase-gate and go-live readiness assessment.
✓If benefits assurance is in scope, business indicators with defined data sources and owners.
Structure of a findingExample
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Review question | Have critical user acceptance tests been completed? |
| Evidence | Scenario list, results log and acceptance sign-off |
| Finding | No evidence of completion for some critical scenarios |
| Business impact | Uncertainty whether the related transaction will work in live use |
| Recommendation and decision | Complete the missing tests; assess the phase-gate decision against current evidence |
06 / Boundaries
How this differs from other areas
{{q.a}}
The assessing role, delivery responsibility and any potential conflicts of interest are disclosed at the start. We do not treat work we manage as an independent audit by default.
Other service areas
Let's talk
Let's talk about the decision you need to make.
Share where your program stands or the issue you are questioning in your current SAP system, and let's agree on the right assessment scope together.
or send an email: info@akademidx.com.tr